Healthcare?
This is what they mean when they say 'a national solution'

Thanks to Robbie_IV of Filler for the art.
http://filler.comicgenesis.com/

I hope Lieberman loses the primary...

And stomps all over Lamont in the general election. It would show to everyone just how rabid the Democratic Party has become.

Israel vs. The World?

If you haven't been paying attention, Israel has (finally) decided to start attacking enemy operations at large. They've effectively declared war on these groups, and the countries who back them. The only problem is, that's quite a few countries, and if Iran backs Syria, and the US backs Israel, we could be looking at a major conflict. The only question is, have the Islamists made it inevitible?

John McCain is an aspiring tyrant

He's against the First Amendment when it interferes his campaign finance 'reform'. He's openly said that he views the FA as an obstacle to an 'uncorrupt' gov't. He would much rather shut out The People than work with them, McCain-Feingold makes that clear.

He's verbally aggressive against people who oppose him, and he loves anyone who works under him (like his staff) or anyone with a camera. It should be obvious he's a master manipulater; virtually none of his peers in the Senate like him, but the press and his constituency do.

+1

That's the one thing both gov't parasites and wealthy businessmen have in common. They always want one more of whatever they happen to have.

The difference, of course, is the parasites (unions, activists, regulatory agencies) have to take that +1 from somewhere, whereas the much-maligned businessman has to convince people to give it to him. That's the reason parasites do less with more, and businessmen do more with less. The parasites need an excuse to take, and 'insufficiant' resources is as good as they can get. Since the businessman can't take, he can't say "I need more to just keep the service you have now going" without convincing people that he really does. If his competitors don't need it, he's done. But the parasites use force and coercion to get their +1.

Question!

Why are gun bans sold as crime control? I mean, aren't the people the bans are supposed to hamper the very same people that will ignore them?

I don't believe for an instant that the gun banners are that stupid. I am willing to believe that they live in genuine fear of violence, however. Any kind of violence, from that of the mass murderer to that of the grandmother defending herself from said murderer.

How many times have you read/heard/discussed arms control and gotten into the more philosophical debate on self-defense, and they were firmly against it? How many times have you heard "I'm just glad the victim wasn't armed, someone else might've gotten hurt in the crossfire"? "Active Compliance" rhetoric?

Meh

Been having a creativity draught over the past week or so. Haven't dissappeared.

LOL, 1337NESS!











http://filler.comicgenesis.com/